There is the overall feel of professionalism which is good, but there are certain aspects that let it down. It feels bad to try and pick negative things out because I know that I’ll be doing the same next year most likely at the same level. The faults I can pick out are just the small things which you would expect from a student-made project, like clunky changes and small editing issues. The main body of WINOL is good though, the material that they are reporting on is interesting and factual. The pieces to camera obviously lack the fluidity of say a BBC report, but it was still good. I especially like the little professional touches that are included, such as in the piece about the rugby club, the displaying of the quote onscreen rather than just reading it out.
In any case, the general feel and approach was good. I hope that when it’s our turn to do this it’ll be just as good. Since everything is a learning experience I like to think I’ve picked up on some key details which will help with my own reporting to camera, but I guess only time will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment