second WINOL review

Round two of the WINOL review process, my standing apology is still in effect to all older students. I'm sure my own efforts will be of the same level. I'd also like to repeat the statement that overall I thought it was good, better than last weeks, but with a few points. First thing I'll pick up on is describing the MP as a rebel, even though he states himself that he doesn't think of himself as a rebel... We had a discussion about whether or not this was libelous and I'm still undecided on that but personally, if he clearly and openly states that he doesnt think of himself as a rebel, I wouldn't label him such, but I'm probably wrong. There's also the fact that he libelled Ed Milliband, but who hasnt. Plus I thought he was grandstanding a bit but that's more his fault rather than the makers. This was the only real complaint that I have against it, the rest of the report was good, I was particularly impressed by how professional the piece about lasers sounded. That and the fact that I was wearing the same shirt as the sports guy.